David Schnuckel
  • Home
  • Work
    • The Archives >
      • Autobiographical Stemware >
        • Taught
        • Incongruent
        • Speculative
        • Oblivious
        • Encumbered
        • Wrongfully Brazen
        • Miscalculating
        • Inadequate
        • Expectant
      • Specialty Bottles >
        • Incindiary
        • Lacerative
        • Bystanding
        • Sideways
        • Vaseline
        • Open Container
        • Launch Pad
        • Cortège
        • Convey
      • Abstracted Portraiture >
        • Excess
        • Hitch
        • Redundancy
        • Internalize
        • (im)Balance
        • Trifecta
        • Trajectory
        • Feed
        • Hush
        • Surveyor
        • Growing Pains
        • Epiphany
        • Fizzle
        • Birdsong
      • Word Pictures >
        • Liabost Faire (present tense)
        • Liabost Faire (past tense)
        • Liabost Faire (past and present tense)
        • Liabost Faire (present tense) 2.0
        • Liabost Faire (past tense) 2.0
        • Liabost Faire (fair conditions)
        • Liabost Faire (moderate conditions)
        • Liabost Faire (dense conditions)
      • per.me.able works >
        • Porous Blossoms
        • Termarium
        • Termarium, Too
      • the b|d collaborative >
        • (hypo)thesis
        • (com)mensural
        • (hatch)ling
        • chimeric
        • (b)reach
        • thirst
    • Meaningful Gibberish Project >
      • Lavish Puddles
      • Slump Trajectory - Right Side Up
      • Slump Trajectory - Upside Down
      • Formative Still Frames
      • Col-Lapse: Martini Study
      • (col)Lapse
      • Decadel
      • Acrobatics
      • Gestural Mouthing
      • Vestigial
      • Vestigial Specimen
      • Moving Pictures >
        • Profile Study - Right Side Up LF
        • Profile Study - Upside Down LF
        • Profile Study - Duo LF
        • Profile Study - Right Side Up HF
        • Overhead Study - Right Side Up LF
        • Overhead Study - Right-Side Up HF
        • Animate Tendencies - Poise
        • Animate Tendencies - Palindrome
        • Animate Tendencies - Arrhythmia
        • Animate Tendencies - Tachycardia
        • Animate Tendencies - Heave
        • Animate Tendencies - Gasp
        • SITE+SOUND - Acquiesce
        • SITE+SOUND - Coalesce
      • Chance Choreography
      • Deliquesce
      • Polymerous Cube
      • Residue
      • #endofslotsurvey Project
      • Cartograph
      • Cartograph (wall)
      • Cartograph (floor)
      • Combustible Drop Cloths
      • Exothermic Chance Maps
      • Calorimeter
      • Calorimeter (findings)
  • CV
  • News
  • Writing
  • Links
Keeping tabs on David is just a click away.

GASnews, Fall 2015, Volume 26, Issue 3

9/20/2015

0 Comments

 

​Today In the Context of Tomorrow:

Reflecting Upon The Contemporary Art + Design Wing Opening At The Corning Museum Of Glass
And Its Implications On The 2016 GAS Conference 
It’s official: the Fall 2015 issue of GASnews has been released...and mine is the cover article!

This issue is considered to be one addressing elements of ‘crossover’ between glass and contemporary art. With the writing assignments discussed amongst the GASnews writing staff  soon after the San Jose Conference, I couldn’t help but want to kill 2 birds with one stone: to examine the opening of the highly anticipated Contemporary Art + Design Wing at CMOG last March (a ceremonious ribbon-cutting event which I had been on hand for) and to think forward of its role in the upcoming Conference to be hosted in Corning, New York next June.  

Although drawing heavily from my own experience and observations of the Wing’s official public opening on March 20th, 2015, the back half of the article was certainly a ‘group effort’. I had the distinct pleasure of reaching out to many, many notable figures of the Corning Museum of Glass’s staff ranging from several departmental corners of its campus.  Lots of real and genuine perspective from pillars of that community with a lot of tireless assistance by CMOG’s Public Relations Specialist, Kimberly Thompson.  Suffice it to say that every moment working on this article was a real pleasure for me.  I hope it comes through in the piece...

Below is the article I submitted in its full, unedited version to serve as supplemental material to what is seen in the Fall 2015 issue of GASnews:
​
​          On the morning of March 20, 2015, a substantial gathering of people had traveled from all around the world to witness a historic moment in the Admissions Lobby of The Corning Museum of Glass.  A sizeable mass of curious supporters, patrons and fanatics of the Museum had claimed a rather sizeable foyer, standing shoulder to shoulder before a red ribbon.  Beyond that ribbon was a white curtain; behind that curtain was an entrance to a highly anticipated expansion; and within that expansion was the promise of experiencing the landscape of contemporary glass within an entirely new context.
 
          The attention of the lobby’s audience turned to a podium sharply at 10 a.m. when a series of local dignitaries and executives provided welcoming remarks to the grand opening of the Contemporary Art + Design Wing.  Words were followed by applause, a celebratory rumble of cheer that collectively came to an abrupt hush as ceremonial scissors were drawn. A brief flooding of anxious anticipation filled the air as those scissors opened; each blade positioned wide apart, straddling the ribbon, only to swiftly come together. Within a single cut the severed ribbon fell, an explosion of streamers descended across the lobby and the white curtain just beyond the ribbon had dropped.  Gasps from the crowd were loud and distinct, a signal to mark a very special moment as an entranceway now laid before them; a passage not only to a new addition of The Corning Museum of Glass, but to a new way of perceiving the trajectory of studio glass as it presently stands.
Picture
          ​The Contemporary Art + Design Wing includes a spacious 26,000 square foot building designed by the New York City-based architect firm Thomas Phifer and Partners.  Its exterior structure assumes the form of a white rectangular block; sleek, sizeable and poised with stylish stoicism.  However, its interior is far from predictable. Unembellished and entirely white, five immense exhibition spaces ebb and flow within that interior and are composed of soft, elliptically bowing walls that separate each gallery from one another.  High ceilings lend way to a roof of skylights; an intention to invite the varying radiance of the sun from day-to-day (let alone hour-to-hour) to naturally illuminate over 70 works from the Museum’s permanent collection…each piece seldom revealing itself the same way within a given year.  The galleries are separated by themes hosting a minimal number of objects, large-scale projects and installations relating to nature, the body, material and history and design.  A very special exhibition space will present a rotating display of a singular and spatially extensive installation work by a contemporary artist approaching the notion of light. Kiki Smith’s piece Constellation serves as the initiatory work to launch this continuous project.
Picture
​ 
In addition to the gallery space is the equally spacious Amphitheater Hot Shop, located in the former Steuben Glass factory.  A walkway joins the gallery to a 500-seat amphitheater; a performative stadium with terraced seating and a viewing balcony circulating around the theater’s outer perimeter at the gallery-level. Down below, at the theatre’s forefront, is an elaborate hot glass working stage equipped with state of the art equipment; a stage built for serious hot glass investigation not only utilized by skillful Museum staff glass workers for demonstration, but to host visiting artist programming, performances and public glass-making events.  If the galleries next door represent a very contemporary approach to how artists and designers think through glass, then the amphitheater exhibits contemporary approaches to how artists and designers physically handle it.  The Amphitheater Hot Shop informs a viewing public how making with hot glass can be done, but the more exciting part of its purpose is in the programming designed to challenge what hot glass and hot glass processes have yet to discover.
Picture
 ​           Although several months past its highly anticipated opening, the Contemporary Art + Design Wing still elicits as much excitement now as it did this past March. The ideas that had driven its design - it’s complete devotion to light, it’s spaciousness, the complex nuances that contribute to it’s total neutrality of it as a viewing space - all contribute to an emphasis upon its visiting public to truly ‘see’ the nature of each individual work within it; works that are not only a testament to a higher standard of technical proficiency, but, more importantly, works that reveal the sophisticated range at which glass today serves as a vehicular medium for idea based, content-driven exploration.  If The Corning Museum of Glass were a book in progress, the new addition is a chapter freshly written and specifically designed to read in the present tense.
 
          The space doesn’t feel as much as a museum as it does a sanctuary; a sacred place that holds the attention of its visitor in a state of wonder.  For those who consider themselves a seasoned CMOG patron, the new wing still has potential for impact; a place to allow for moments of rediscovery.  In fact, the Contemporary Art + Design Wing withholds new and unforeseen moments of revelation for its visitor in how glass has become a material in search for meaning by way of technology.
 
          ‘GlassApp’ can be accessed by a visitor’s phone or device to find supplemental text, images, and video on the exhibiting work and about the artist responsible for making it.   The app is not only an opportunity to further enhance one’s experience of a singular piece, but further evidence of the new wing’s intention for visitors to ‘see’ the contemporary collection within a broader consideration. 
Picture
            In fact, it is this idea of setting the stage to fully consider what’s before us as a glass community that is motivating the 2016 GAS Conference.  “Creating Context: Glass In A New Light” will be hosted for the seventh time in Corning, New York next June.  “We are delighted that the Crystal City remains a venue for this important conference,” says President and Executive Director of The Corning Museum of Glass, Karol Wight.  “Because glass remains the center of much activity in Corning, we take pride in being a repeat venue and in being able to naturally combine art, science, technology and community.” 
 
             “GAS has placed [the upcoming] Conference in a unique context surrounded by glass resources that just do not exist anywhere else in the world,” notes Steve Gibbs, Conference Co-Chair and Senior Manager of Hot Glass Programs. The ancient to contemporary glass collections, the Rakow Research Library, The Studio and the Innovation Center already define Corning’s hosting legacy as one of tremendous diversity. “[But] the highlight for GAS Members will be showcasing the stunning new Contemporary Art + Design Wing,” says Christine Sharkey, Conference Co-Chair and Director of Community Affairs at Corning Incorporated.  “Corning is such a mecca for the glass community,” adds Amy Schwartz, director of The Studio. “[The Conference] will be a big gathering of new ideas and a reunion of old friends.”
 
          Expanding upon the Conference theme, Curator of American Glass and GAS Board Member Kelly Conway states, “The whole idea of creating context is really about creating relationships.  That’s really what GAS is all about, right?  We love to come together and relate our experiences and our knowledge to each other.”  Notions of history and tradition with the Corning area are complemented by the new wing’s associations with innovation and new possibility, facilitating a dialogue about the present day state of contemporary glass in relation to its past and what that could imply about its future.
 
          Conway continues by saying, “Corning’s legacy as a center for glassmaking is unparalleled.  There is a constant reinvention of art and industry alive in Corning, which has existed for nearly 150 years.  The GAS Conference is a vital part of our community awareness about trends and forecasts in artistic and educational developments in the glass world.”
 
            To further redefine context within the upcoming Conference, the Museum features an abundance of performative space for glass workers to demonstrate a wide variety of glass making processes.  “The daylight filled Amphitheater Hot Shop, Innovations Stage, The Studio and Courtyard Stage all will be ground zero for demonstrations every morning of the Conference,” says Gibbs. “Excellent views, seating, sound and video systems can accommodate large groups of attendees to give an up-close and intimate experience – even at the large venues accommodating hundreds of observers.” Gibbs continues,  “The sheer numbers of people able to watch demonstrations has never been available at a GAS Conference before.”
           
            Yet there’s also the context of place associated with the Corning area that indirectly influences the nature of the upcoming Conference.  A small community nestled within the hills of the Finger Lakes, the charm and intimacy of its locale lends way to the idea of stronger interactions taking place between GAS Members, the Conference programming and the Museum community. “Corning is a small town and there are fewer distractions than in [larger metropolitan sites],” points out Beth Hylen, the Rakow Research Library’s Reference and Education Librarian.  “We need places and events where people can congregate and make [new] connections.”
 
            The addition of the Contemporary Art + Design Wing helps solidify The Corning Museum of Glass’s place as a world leading institution dedicated to a single material. What was already a versatile facility in speaking about the story of glass (and its continual evolution) has somehow surpassed its own ability to articulate that narrative.  The new wing promises to impact the 2016 GAS Conference in a similar way; providing a platform for its attendees to not only rediscover the trajectory of the contemporary field of glass at present, but to reevaluate our individual places within it and consider exactly where we’d like that to go.

​
David Schnuckel is an artist and educator, currently serving as Visiting Assistant Professor
​to the Glass Program of the Rochester Institute of Technology in Rochester, New York.


0 Comments

Emails That Kick Ass (Vol 6): DEFINING IMPETUS

9/4/2015

0 Comments

 
It took some time, but I eventually realized that I write a lot.  In fact, much more than I truly realized.  Just not in the way that I had always saw myself doing.

As an educator, I’m approached by students, alumni, colleagues, administration and outside parties through email…a ton.  In fact, a big part of my after hours is spent on replying to all sorts of issues.  Some big.  Some small.  Never anything in between, interestingly enough.  But, the big ones are the ones I’m really proud of because it’s usually a moment where I can address a significant issue that relates to the professional development of my students…

…emails that provide a teachable moment that happens out of class, out of the designed curriculum and with no current place in my class itinerary: teaching in real-time, as I like to say.
I put a lot of care into every thing I do and, although trying to be informative, my secondary intention with these well considered emails is to impress upon my students the power of words and the value in articulating thought through written form.

EMAILS THAT KICK ASS are a collection of such correspondence…cut and pasted directly from my Outlook box, but with names changed to protect both the innocent and the guilty!

*DEFINING IMPETUS* is a reply to a {Senior Thesis Student} in regards to the student’s first steps towards developing a Thesis Proposal.  

One of the most exciting parts for glass students embarking on their final year is the notion of standing on their own feet creatively: developing a body of work based entirely on their own personal interests and curiosity without assigned projects, guidelines within those projects, and pre-established conceptual prompts. However, on the other hand, it is also a very difficult process to have free-range over their creative activity: what does one pursue? how does one pursue it? why is one pursuing it?  what’s it’s significance personally? ...or within the context of contemporary art/craft/design? how will this work be unlike anything else that’s already out there? how are these ideas original? what’s innovative about these interests? what are the ideas? how do they develop? where does one start?...

The Senior Thesis year is, essentially, the base layer with which graduating students will build their artistic identity and personal practice upon. It’s training in real time and is a big, big deal. The good news is, whether they realize it or not, that students in their Thesis year have been preparing for this daunting task of developing a cohesive body of work ever since they stepped in the door...

It is my hope that in the Senior year students realize that all the work that I’ve facilitated in the projects assigned during the Sophomore and Junior year wasn’t just about ‘the making’ or ‘the glass.’ A significant portion of each project’s guidelines included a checklist of required items for students to tackle to simply give body to a single idea to motivate the work for that project: cultivating personal questions based on a generalized topic, propelling thought through wordplay and creative association, looking at certain things within various sources of reference, looking for certain things within various sources of reference, reading certain things; making connections between these observations, taking notes, scribbling thoughts, and drawing potential making directions based on what was discovered along the way. It wasn’t just busy work; it was activity to train students how they each come to define, establish, and articulate their vision...especially when they are out the door and maintaining a personal making practice one on their own.
​
Regardless, the following is a small piece of advice and encouragement to a {Senior Thesis Student} who was taking a first step towards defining what the Senior Thesis research and work would entail. I had asked all Seniors to compose a Thesis Proposal and, although a short document, it is a very difficult thing to compose when there is still so much uncertainty about what to make and what ideas are perpetuating the investigation so early on in the academic year.  This was my attempt to help guide the student’s thinking who had clearly communicated in the first few drafts (and exhibited in previous work) a desire to integrate digital technology within the student’s Thesis body of work...
​Hi {Senior Thesis Student},
 
Attached are my thoughts to your refined version of your proposal.  The length is definitely there, but there is still some need to truly define what it is you're working towards this year.
 
We'll most definitely define it along the way, but I think it's important to really identify what question(s) you're asking yourself to motivate the work.  Some people call this the 'concept' of your work; some people call this the 'theme' of your work; some people call this the 'idea' of your work...whatever terminology we decide to choose to call it, the impetus that will be driving the nature of your making has yet to be defined. 
 
Merging digital technology with our glass in a harmonious way is not in itself an idea.  The software and equipment are tools...and the output of those tools lend way to a part of the process. Now, putting tools and processes of interest aside, what motivates your making?  What artists do you respond to and what ideas are motivating that work?  What artists are using technology in their artistic practice that you admire...and what is motivating that work?  What memories do you cherish from childhood and what do those entail? If you dig a little deeper into what those memories entail, do you see any meaningful connections to what interests you at present day?  Does that lend way to some interesting explorations within our work?
 
Here are some approaches to work motivated by ideas that have required artists to merge technology and the crafts to facilitate that exploration:
 
* Contemplations of time
* Processuality...using process as subject matter conceptually, using process as the artwork itself
* (re)Modeling Nature (reinterpreting mathematical curiosities of the natural world)
* Reinterpreting historical objects/philosophies in making
* Creating impossible scenarios in Materiality (Geoff Mann)
* Rendering/reinterpreting impossible historical glass objects for sculptural purpose
* Rendering/reinterpreting iconic motifs within historical masterpieces in an innovative/meaningful/uniquely-provocative-to-the-present-day manner
* Work that relates to the body
* Microscopic/Macroscopic
* Mapping topography as a speculation on 'place'
* Mapping sounds as a way to 'see' how what it is we 'hear' looks like
* Data driven sculpture: forms created by algorithms found in search engines, sound recordings, etc...
* New approaches to rendering/manipulating the figure...issues related to rebooting figurative sculpture
* New approaches to rendering/manipulating self-portraiture...issues related to identity
* Issues related to Authenticity (working with or against notions of copying/fraudulence/copyright/ownership…)
 
I have other thoughts that I'll save for a studio visit.  In the meantime, Wil and I have many recently written MFA thesis papers in our office.  At the front of those dissertations is the MFA candidate’s proposal that perpetuated their thesis reserach.  Some of them are good.  Some of them are OK.  But all of them will provide an example of the balancing act between the kind of generalizations and specificity required in your proposal.
 
Good Start!
David
 
0 Comments

    Archives

    July 2018
    April 2018
    January 2018
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    May 2017
    March 2017
    December 2016
    October 2016
    June 2016
    March 2016
    December 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    June 2015
    March 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    June 2014
    September 2013
    March 2012
    January 2012
    February 2010

    RSS Feed

    Categories

    All